Every witch way but loose
By Joel Beck
A planned TV reality show suggests that Pagan religions haven't yet made the leap to mainstream acceptance. But for some local witches and spiritualists, that's not a bad thing.
Emilie May probably can't speak for the vampires, voodoo priests or psychics of the world, but she knows a thing or two about being a witch. Certainly she knows more, she feels, than anyone on payroll at the Sci-Fi Network.
Living la vida Wicca in the suburbs of St. Paul, Minn., May says she's no stranger to the occasional bouts with ridicule and misconceptions about her beliefs. It isn't uncommon, she says, for people to look at the pentagram dangling from her neck and immediately mistake her for a Satan-worshipping heathen living in a basement full of live goats and dead chickens.
"People tend to still think witches are old ladies casting hexes on people," May says. "They think I'm evil. Then there are the people who are desperate to save my soul. It's ridiculous."
Even today, in a supposed age of acceptance and tolerance, May says people are still shocked and horrified to discover they're standing in front of a witch when all they see is a young, pretty 23-year-old woman.
While the ignoramuses search for the ugly warts, the pointed nose and the flying broomstick, May can only roll her eyes and silently fume.
But it was seeing the phrase "Real live witch wanted" posted on the Sci-Fi cable network's Web site several weeks ago that really got May fuming. Last month, the network began recruiting contestants for the reality TV show "Mad, Mad House," which will feature a witch, a vampire, a yoga master, a voodoo priest and a psychic, all living under the same roof a part of a contest to determine who's the wackiest and weirdest.
For her, the show represents everything that's wrong with the way people view Pagan religions - religions based on spiritual, sometimes "magical" views of nature and the earth, as opposed to a particular deity.
"It irritated me," says May. "It irritated me to the point where I sent out e-mails to all my family and friends.
"As long as the majority of people in this country believe in the same organized basic religion, this is how it's going to be," May adds. "As long as most people believe in the old stories and the fairy tales, it's never going to change."
The ripple caused by May's ire could be felt all the way (not surprisingly) in Salem, where her e-mail campaign eventually made it to the Salem Web message board and has been a topic of discussion for several weeks. In some ways, it's hard to argue with May's logic, especially when people from more mainstream religions begin to chime in with their thoughts on Wicca, witchcraft, and just about every other belief system that doesn't involve sitting in pews on Sunday mornings.
Rev. Kenneth Stiegler of Salem's Wesley Methodist Church says he disagrees with but respects the religious practices of Salem's witch community, but that's not to say his views wouldn't be disturbing to the average witch: Stiegler thinks the desire to take part in such practices may stem more from the popularity of the WB network than actual "religious" beliefs.
"The whole Wiccan milieu is certainly more accepted in general [these days], but not in the church's mind," Stiegler says. "When you have four or five major TV programs that are all about witchcraft and you've got people waiting in long lines for the next Harry Potter book, there's a big hunger to learn the Wiccan religion."
Therein lies the sticking point for people like May, who says its high time people started respecting Wiccans and people with more spirituality-based beliefs as more than just fodder for TV and children's books. But while there appears to be plenty of support in her corner, there are some in the witch community who think she should give it a rest.
For people like Salem witch Shawn Poirier, being a witch has always been about straying from the mainstream to a certain extent and to him, there's no reason to change that now. Take the time last week when Poirer couldn't answer a reporter's phone call because he was busy "mixing a potion" - scenarios like that, just by their nature, are what will always make witches outsiders to the non-potion-mixing crowd.
And that's OK, says Poirier.
"Witches need to lighten up," Poirier says. "If you don't want to be associated with the dark and mysterious world, then don't use the word 'witch.' Witches don't want to be mainstream."
Oh yeah? Depends on whom you ask.
But seriously, folks
Not only does Poirier disagree with May's opinion that the Sci-Fi Network's proposed reality show is nothing more than a platform to exploit the beliefs of Wiccans and other Pagan religions, he believes the show will bring some credibility to the witch lifestyle. So much so that he even plans to audition for the program.
"I think you need to have a real magical person on (the show) who lives in (witchcraft) every day," says Poirier, who may have a leg up on just about anyone else who auditions simply because he lives in Salem, the unofficial witch capital of North America. The long hair, flowing black robes and extravagant jewelry probably won't hurt his chances either.
"All the Sci-Fi channel is asking for is a full-time witch that's good enough to do witchcraft," Poirier adds. "They're looking for people with alternate lifestyles who really believe in what they do."
That may be true, and people like Poirier may very well enjoy remaining on the mysterious outer fringes of religious circles, but it doesn't change the fact that the majority of the church-going population doesn't take their beliefs seriously.
Just ask Barbara Farewell, a psychic medium who is also the vice president of the Church of Spiritualism in Swampscott. She says there are always going to be misconceptions around her faith, especially when most of her beliefs deal with talking to the dead and utilizing her psychic abilities.
|

It often sounds gimmicky to devout Protestants and God-fearing Catholics, which is the primary reason Farewell says she often has to defend, or at least explain, her faith to others.
"People think we're fortune tellers. We're not," she says flatly. "I'd say we have a very positive religion. When we're in our circle, you have a lot of energy that's very positive and very healthy."
In Salem, there are also those who argue that it's hypocritical to denounce witchcraft - after all, just look at what the city represents. Salem witch Jacqui Newman is one of those people. When you can hardly walk half a block without seeing a shop selling little witches riding on broomsticks, she says it seems a little silly to condemn the Pagan lifestyle.
"This whole city exists because people were killed here because of (witchcraft)," Newman says. "Whether they were actual witches or not, this city is honoring the dead."
And alluding to a suggested Sunday photo pose, she points out, "If your football team can be called the Salem Witches, then certainly I can go and have my picture taken in pantyhose in a graveyard."
Meanwhile, though witch purists like Minnesota's May might think the co-opting of her religion for profit via the broomstick trade is reprehensible, some of those who make a living peddling the merchandise believe it was practicing witches themselves who led to the commercialization of Paganism.
At Salem's Witch's Tee souvenir shop, a store that features a T-shirt stating "Coed Naked Witchcraft: Because Sometimes You Need the Exorcise," manager Angelic Merrill cites renowned local witch Laurie Cabot for taking the phenomenon to a new level.
"This city still had witch history, but it just wasn't as capitalized upon until Laurie Cabot starting writing books," says Merrill. "Having witch stores probably became popular and more well-known when she starting putting her witch books out to the area."
But it's a big leap from accepting witch tchotchkes as part of the natural order of things in Salem and embracing Pagan principles, or accepting Wicca as a legitimate religion.
"I think a lot of people think Wicca and witchcraft is a sort of philosophy or nature-based religion," says Dominico Bettenelli of Salem, managing editor of the Catholic World Report. "It's my opinion that if you're not worshipping God, then you're worshipping something else. And from a Christian perspective, if you're not worshipping God, then you're not doing the right thing."
Resistance from within
There's no denying that when Poirier became the first witch to be recognized as a minister in the city's interfaith council of clergy several years ago, it was a sign that witchcraft and the Wiccan religion were finally becoming at least somewhat more accepted in mainstream religious circles.
Now if only those in the religion could agree on things.
Poirier says these days, Pagans run into the most trouble not with the general public, but with people within their own ranks. Perhaps the best example of such internal discord is the case of Oberon
Zell-Ravenheart, the founder and former leader of the Church of All Worlds, based in northern California, and the man credited with shaping the modern definition of "Pagans" and "Neo-Pagans."
It's been more than 40 years since Zell-Ravenheart, who will be speaking in Salem next week, established the Church of All Worlds after reading Robert Heinlein's science fiction novel, "Stranger in a Strange Land." Surely starting a Pagan religion based on ideals of free love found in an obscure 1960s sci-fi novel didn't win Zell-Ravenheart any points with the Vatican, but he says justifying his beliefs has never been much of a problem. And he really wouldn't care if it was.
"We really don't worry much about trying to convince anybody," says
Zell-Ravenheart, who once upon a time was known simply as Timothy Zell. "We've never tried to get anybody to join us or anything. It's always been a matter of us saying 'Here we are and this is what we feel. If you feel the same way, then you're welcome to join us.'"
But as to what exactly they are feeling, there seems to be some disagreement about that. After 40 years of leading the Church of All Worlds, a church he created, a significant falling out with the new regime currently has him on the outside looking in.
"The current administration basically trashed everything I've done in 40 years," says
Zell-Ravenheart.
It's ironic, he says, that there remains significant infighting within Pagan religions while the more religiously conservative populace has started to loosen up a little. He attributes much of the new acceptance to the "Harry Potter" or reality TV culture, the same phenomenon that makes witches like May's blood boil.
"Society itself is finding that these things are happening and are much more acceptable," Zell-Ravenheart says. "Much of the new-age value system, which includes a lot of the Pagan perspective, has become mainstreamed. People are embracing the values of environmentalism and feminism."
Poirier explains that often times, Pagan leaders get too caught up in the political aspects of religion, thus alienating those around them and ultimately losing sight of why they began practicing witchcraft in the first place. He certainly runs into his share of fundamentalists and born-again Christians bent on saving his soul from the devil, but Poirier says it's those witches who spend a great deal of time writing letters to Congress that he clashes with the most.
For Poirier, witchcraft is about living life according to magic. Even if it means going on reality TV to prove it.
"In Salem, there are some wonderfully magical witches and there are some people about as magical as a potato," he says. "They get more into politics in town and they get on this council and that board. That's not witchcraft. Those are usually the ones who are so desperately trying to define what the word 'witch' is and they're also the ones who want to control what the word 'witch' is.
"Witchcraft was never meant to be this religious movement," he continues. "I want the chaos because I never want witchcraft to come to the point where it's canon and liturgical like every other religion."
E-mail reporter Joel Beck at jbeck@cnc.com.
|
India rediscovers kama
By Sultan Shahin
NEW DELHI - Indian civilization is on the move, and it may be coming into its own after a millennium and a half of decline.
At the height of its civilization, India was the land of the Kama Sutra, Koke Shastra, Ananga Ranga - the sacred literature teaching ways and means of heightening sexual pleasure, not only with one's own spouse, but also with other partners.
It was the land of Mahabharat, the greatest epic known to mankind, where Lord Krishna, whose divine exhortations are contained in the Bhagwad Gita, could be worshipped with his beloved Radha, who was someone else's spouse, perhaps that of his maternal uncle. It was the land of Khajuraho temples depicting copulating couples and multiples on its inner walls that prudes consider pornographic. It was the land of Kalidasa, one of the greatest Sanskrit poets who celebrated sex with an openness unparalleled in world literature.
With its decline, for some obscure reason ascribed to a natural cycle of the rise and fall of civilizations, India turned prudish and guilt-ridden about free sex. The introduction of Islamic and Judeo-Christian morality did not help. India ceased to be proud of Khajuraho and Kalidas. Krishna and Radha were still worshipped together, but children would not be told about their open illicit love affair. Both kama (sensual pleasure) and artha (wealth creation), the two essential aspects of the Indian way of life (dharma) suffered. India ceased being itself.
But as artha was revitalized with the introduction of new economic policies of liberalization and globalization and new technologies such as computers and the Internet in the early 1990s, it seems now that kama too has made a comeback. Perhaps the two go together.
Several sex surveys carried out recently point to a definite resurgence of guilt-free extramarital sex, as much on the initiative of women now as it was on the bidding of men before. Commenting on the findings of the KamaSutra Cross Tab Sex Survey 2003, conducted in association with Indiatimes, published on Thursday, sex expert Prakash Kothari said, "One can easily kiss that crummy era goodbye. A nation of 1 billion is getting sexy and kicking the guilt." Psychiatrist Sanjay Chugh, MD, is jubilant: Finally, "it" is happening in India.
Permissiveness is at an all-time high. Respondents across India (Bangalore 27 percent; Chennai 28 percent; Delhi 22 percent; Hyderabad 20 percent; Kolkata 32 percent; Mumbai 24 percent) feel that both partners should be free to have extramarital sex with the spouse's consent. Delhiites are most likely to have done it at a younger age than their counterparts in other cities. Hyderabadis and Mumbaikars show the maximum inclination to infidelity, summarized Anubha Sawhney, breaking the news of the survey in Thursday's The Times of India.
While the survey reveals that breasts are the No 1 sexual-arousal point for Indian males, followed by overall looks and butts, the Indian woman prefers good looks, eyes, and a muscular physique in her man. Nationwide, experimentation is the name of the game.
Although the missionary position continues to be the preferred one of couples engaging in sex, respondents to the survey reveal that they are open to other options. As for the average age at which Indians have their first experience of sex, figures indicate that virgins are a dying breed.
There is no bar on age, time or place. Indians want sex again and again. The Hyderabadis have sex 17.1 times a month. This is a national record. Comparing the results of this survey with the figures furnished by the Durex Global Survey, which accords top position to the French for having sex 167 times a year, Sawhney concludes that this could even be a world record.
This month the second-largest-circulated newsmagazine Outlook carried out a survey in several Indian metros to come up with similar results. Its correspondents interviewed sex specialists and psychologists in Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata, Chennai and Ahmedabad, among other cities, to discover that in the business of sex now, women are indeed on top, literally. Titled "Woman on top: Eves do it too", the Outlook cover story on May 5 said: "It's not just Adam for Madam. The Indian woman storms another male bastion as she seeks sex - and solace - outside her marriage."
The authors of the story, Madhu Jain and Soutik Biswas, concluded: "Adultery 2003 is really about women taking the lead. It's also about adultery going middle-class, to small-town India, going commonplace, even going boring. Dangerous liaisons used to be for the aristos and the plebs. Those in between, the middle classes, were tethered by moral chastity belts - only their fantasies could roam freely. Or it was all within the family, the extramarital dalliances, that is. The scarlet letter is now fading fast: stigma is getting passe and guilt for an increasing number is no more than a twitch.
"We are probably more adulterous now than ever before, with women catching up with the men on the adultery stakes. Says D Narayana Reddy, a sexologist and marital therapist in Chennai, 'I have been practicing since 1982. In those days, my women clients would say a strict No to anything outside marriage. By 1992, the attitude was What's wrong if I did it? By 2002, they were daring to explore.'"
The real source of the massive urge for sexual exploration that Indians, particularly women, have developed suddenly is as mysterious as the reasons for the rise and all of civilizations. But one thing has come out clearly in the survey. New technology is an important factor encouraging the phenomenon. Internet and mushrooming cyber cafes have helped, as have mobile phones and SMS (short message service) facilities. Women and men have suddenly heard from old flames, childhood friends, former classmates, whom they may have fancied once, dates have been fixed, and one thing has led to another. In most cases straight, unembarrassed initiatives have come from women, as men twiddled their fingers thinking of creative ways of broaching the subject.
Wife swapping, relatively unknown in India until recently, has made an appearance. Adventurous couples are advertising in newspapers their desire to meet like-minded people for wife and husband swapping.
Indian cinema was known for its kid-glove treatment of female sexuality. Indian woman being shown having sex outside marriage would be considered unpatriotic. And if at all the heroine committed that misdemeanor, premarital sex, she would have to try committing suicide, only to be rescued by the hero and his parents agreeing to marriage.
Now in the age of cable television's soaps, nearly all the characters in family dramas are shown as having pre- or extramarital sexual relations; most marriages are shown to be illegal, in the sense that the couple had been married before and not divorced. This creates more room for the scriptwriters to push in intrigue and blackmail, keeping families, including kids, glued to their television sets throughout the evenings.
Vijay Nagaswami, a Chennai-based psychiatrist and author of Courtship & Marriage: A Guide for Indian Couples, was quoted by Outlook as saying that couples expect a healthy sex life and are less inhibited about discussing their sexual experiences now. "Sex is no longer a taboo word and more people, particularly women, are more willing to talk sex with their partners."
India's sex guru Prakash Kothari, who heads the department of sexual medicine at the Kem Hospital and the GS Medical College in Mumbai, added: "Thirty years ago, I said most Indian men use their women as sleeping pills. Today Indian women feel their sexual desires are basic human rights, and they need to be respected."
Hyderabad-based andrologist and impotence expert Sudhakara Krishnamurti told Outlook that a decade ago couples would come to him after failing to consummate their marriages for 10-15 years. Today wives often drag their husbands into the clinic within the first week of their marriage. "With women being more demanding in the bedroom, it puts a lot of pressure on normal guys," he said.
Even visitors from the liberated West are flummoxed. They have seen nothing like this before. Carin Fisher, a German-American lawyer who moved to New Delhi about a year ago, has been quoted as saying: "The acceptance of adultery here was, and sometimes still is, quite shocking to me. So many married men here tell me that even Krishna cheated and that I am stuck in some sort of Judeo-Christian cultural context. The god had a good time and he was not condemned for it, they say. And some women I have met, mostly the educated middle-class ones - if you can believe it - tell me, 'Look at our heritage. It is natural. Look at Krishna.'"
Well-known socialite Bina Ramani talks of her conversion to the fast-growing creed of adultery: "I was shocked when I first came back to India some years ago. Everybody seemed to be having extramarital affairs. You don't do that in the West. You have serial monogamy. But I have changed my mind. If there is a Krishna in men, there is a Radha in women. Why can't I be both: a wife and Radha? We are born with it. Men are doing their Krishna thing, aren't they?"
|
Middle-class India is having a whale of a time, obviously. But it must also beware. Not everybody is happy. Some spouses are hurt. Detective agencies, particularly the new breed of cyber detectives, are being flooded with requests for snooping on the activities and e-mail accounts of married men and women. They are busy documenting illicit affairs, hacking computers of married people engaged in such affairs. Some agencies report having to deal with 10-15 new cases every day. All for the convenience of divorce lawyers who may need them.
Not surprisingly, divorce is rampant. About 5,000 divorces a year are being reported from
Haryana, with a population of 17 million. In some cities, Kolkata for instance, the number of divorce cases has doubled. A total of 13,037 divorce cases were filed in the city between January and August last year, nearly double the number filed in all of 1999.
Divorce lawyers' earnings have doubled. But many are not happy with the provisions of Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code, which says: "Whoever has sexual intercourse with a person who is and whom he knows or has reason to believe to be the wife of another man ... such sexual intercourse not amounting to rape, is guilty of the offense of adultery, and shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years, or with [a] fine, or both."

Commented Soma Wadhwa: "The Indian law on adultery, formulated circa 1860, sounds antediluvian in the 21st century. It's mostly about men settling scores with those who dared sleep with their wives. Women can't litigate against their errant husbands or their husbands' lovers, under the law. And, in turn, women can't be sued for being adulterous."
"Section 497 is based on Old Testament values," said Mumbai-based feminist lawyer Flavia Agnes. "It doesn't protect the rights of women, only protects the proprietorial rights of men over their wives' bodies." Considering that men and women can both cite their spouses' infidelity as reason for seeking divorce, there is no legal rationale, feel many such as Agnes, for a criminal law on adultery that "spares" wives for being adulterous and then "disallows" them from suing their husbands/husbands' paramour for adultery.
Chennai-based advocate Geeta Ramaseshan had, in fact, challenged these gender inequalities in the procedure to file complaints of adultery. Counsel for the Revathy vs Union of India case in 1988, Ramaseshan had argued that Revathy be given the right to lodge a complaint of adultery against her husband. The apex court dismissed the case: "Spouses ought not to be filing complaints against each other ..." This convinced Ramaseshan that "the law on adultery should be scrapped ... It is outdated, mostly misused to harass women, not based on substantive equality, and treats women like male possessions," said she.
Even in ancient India, though, at the height of its glory, there were laws with similar contradictions. In fact the British jurists who made our present laws based Hindu law on
Manu-smriti, also known as Manav-dharm-shastra (Laws of Manu), which ranks in its scriptural sanctity with Ramayana and
Mahabharata.
The laws of Manu provide a fascinating glimpse of the life and times of ancient India and how people (other than Brahmins) tried to beat the law even then to engage in adultery: "[Verse 352] If men persist in seeking intimate contact with other men's wives, the king should brand them with punishments that inspire terror and banish them. [353] For that gives rise among people to the confusion of the castes, by means of which irreligion, that cuts away the roots, works for the destruction of everything.
"[3556] If a man speaks to another man's wife at a bathing place, in a wilderness or a forest, or at the confluence or rivers, he incurs [the guilt of] sexual misconduct. [357] Acting with special courtesy to her, playing around with her, touching her ornaments or clothes, sitting on a couch with her, are all traditionally regarded as sexual misconduct. [358] If a man touches a woman in a non-place [a place other than the hand], or allows himself to be touched by her, with mutual consent, it is all traditionally regarded as sexual misconduct.
"[359] A man who is not a Brahmin deserves to be punished by the loss of his life's breath for sexual misconduct, for the wives of all four castes should always be protected to the utmost. [360] Beggars, panegyrists, men who have been consecrated for a Vedic sacrifice, and workmen may carry on a conversation with other men's wives if they are not prohibited [from doing so by the scriptures]. [361] But a man who has been prohibited should not carry on a conversation with other men's wives; if a man who has been prohibited converses [with them], he should pay a fine of one gold piece.
"[362] This rule does not apply to the wives of strolling actors or of men who live off their own [wives]; for these men have their women embrace [other men], concealing themselves while they have them do the act. [363] But just a very small fine should be paid by a man who carries on a conversation secretly with these women, or with menial servant girls who are used by only one man, or with wandering women ascetics."
Let us end this piece reminding ourselves of how sexy ancient Indians were at the height of their glorious civilization. Adultery was even then in the air. Women would initiate many an affair, even then. But there were faithful, long-suffering wives, ready to forgive their adulterous husbands, if for nothing but to beat the chill of the cold winter. Alas, in the world of hot-air blowers, ready to beat the cold, such poetry may not be composed anymore.
The great Sanskrit poet Kalidasa, India's answer to William Shakespeare, reports on sex in a typical Indian winter and blesses the couples trying to beat the chill:
Women whose husbands continue unfaithful
though bitterly chided again and again,
note them flustered, visibly shaken by guilt:
yet, yearning to be loved (in the chill of winter),
they overlook these wrongs.
Enjoyed long through the long night in love-play
Unceasing by their lusty young husbands
in an excess of passion, driving,
unrelenting, women just stepped into youth
move at the close of night slowly
reeling wrung-out with aching thighs.
With breasts held tight by pretty bodices,
Thighs alluringly veiled by richly dyed silks,
and flowers nestling in their hair, women serve
as adornments for this wintry season.
Lovers enjoying the warmth of budding youth,
pressed hard against breasts glowing golden,
saffron-rubbed, of lively women gleaning sensuous,
sleep, having put to flight the cold.
Young women in gay abandon drink at night
with their fond husbands, the choices wine,
most delicious, exhilarating,
heightening passion to its pitch:
the lilies floating in the wine deliciously
tremble under their fragrant breath.
At dawn, when the rush of passion is spent,
one young woman whose tips of breasts are tight
from her husband's embrace, carefully views;
her body fully enjoyed by him
and laughing gaily, she goes from the bed-chamber
to the living-apartments of the house.
Another loving wife leaves her bed at dawn:
elegant and graceful, slender-waisted,
With deep navel and ample hips;
the splendid mane of hair with curling ends
flowing loose, the wreath of flowers slips down.
With faces radiant as golden lotuses
and long, liquid eyes; with lustrous lips
and hair playing enamored round their shoulders,
women shine in their homes these frosty mornings,
bearing the semblance of the goddess of beauty.
Young women burdened by their ample loins,
and drooping a little at the waist,
wearied bearing their own garments worn at night
for love's sweet rites,
they put on others suited to the day.
Staring at the curves of their breasts covered by nail marks,
touching gingerly the tender sprout of the lower lip bruised by love-bites,
young women rejoice to see these coveted signs of love's fulfillment,
and decorate their faces as the sun rises.
The wintry season that abounds with sweet rice,
and sugar-cane,
and mounds of dark palm-sugar dainties:
when Love waxes proud
and love's sport is fever-pitch;
when the anguish is intense of parted lovers:
May this season be to you ever auspicious!
(Translated from the original Sanskrit by Chandra Rajan)
|
'Oldest sculpture' found in Morocco
By Paul Rincon
BBC Science
A 400,000-year-old stone object unearthed in Morocco could be the world's oldest attempt at sculpture.
The figurine was found 15 metres below ground
That is the claim of a prehistoric art specialist who says the ancient rock bears clear signs of modification by humans.
The object, which is around six centimetres in length, is shaped like a human figure, with grooves that suggest a neck, arms and legs. On its surface are flakes of a red substance that could be remnants of paint.
The object was found 15 metres below the eroded surface of a terrace on the north bank of the River Draa near the town of Tan-Tan. It was reportedly lying just a few centimetres away from stone handaxes in ground layers dating to the Middle Acheulian period, which lasted from 500,000 to 300,000 years ago.
Cultural controversy
The find is likely to further fuel a vociferous debate over the timing of humanity's discovery of symbolism. Hominids such as Homo heidelbergensis and Homo erectus, that were alive during the Acheulian period, are not thought to have been capable of the symbolic thought needed to create art.
Writing in the journal Current Anthropology, Robert Bednarik, president of the International Federation of Rock Art Organisations (IFRAO), suggests that the overall shape of the Tan-Tan object was fashioned by natural processes.
But he argues that conspicuous grooves on the surface of the stone, which appear to emphasise its humanlike appearance, are partially man-made. Mr Bednarik claims that some of these grooves were made by repeated battering with a stone tool to connect up natural depressions in the rock.
Handaxes were found close to the figurine
"What we've got is a piece of stone that is largely naturally shaped.
|
"It has some modifications, but they are more than modifications," Mr Bednarik told BBC News Online.
Mr Bednarik tried to replicate the markings on a similar piece of rock by hitting a stone flake with a
"hammerstone" in the manner of a punch. He then compared the microscopic structure of the fractures with those of the Tan-Tan object.
Sceptic's view
However, Professor Stanley Ambrose of the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, US, said he saw no evidence for tool marks and that, although the figure was evocative, it was most likely the result of "fortuitous natural weathering".
"[Mr Bednarik] has effectively presented all the information necessary to show this is a naturally weathered rock," Professor Ambrose told BBC News Online.
Professor Ambrose points to Mr Bednarik's observation that some rocks in the vicinity of the figure were weathered and even rounded from transport by water. Professor Ambrose believes that rocks and artefacts found at the site could have been disturbed by flowing water in the past.
Mr Bednarik also observes that flecks of a greasy substance containing iron and manganese on the surface of the stone could be red ochre, a substance used as paint by later humans.
"They [the specks] do not resemble corroded natural iron deposits, nor has any trace of this pigment been detected on any of the other objects I have examined from Tan-Tan," writes Mr Bednarik in his paper.
A 200,000-300,000-year-old stone object found at Berekhat Ram in Israel in 1986 has also been the subject of claims that it is a figurine. However, several other researchers later presented evidence to show that it was probably shaped by geological processes.
The Tan-Tan object was discovered in 1999, during a dig directed by Lutz Fiedler, the state archaeologist of Hesse in Germany.
e, not only with one's own spouse, but also with other partners.
|